4/28/2023 0 Comments Shroud of turin dna 2020![]() "I'm happy to discuss this with them," he says. Matteo Borrini, the forensic scientist at Liverpool John Moores University in the United Kingdom who produced that analysis says he will be at the Baltimore meeting and will attend the talk. That research, presented to the AAFS meeting in 2014 and published last year in the Journal of Forensic Sciences, suggested that whoever produced the stains on the shroud believed that people were crucified with their hands crossed above their heads-which historians have contested. The study challenges a previous analysis of the way blood released during a crucifixion would have stained a wrapped body. Then, the researchers applied the blood and "documented and analyzed" the "resulting flow patterns over the simulated, crucified subjects." "Professional medical personnel were invited to not only contribute to the experimental protocol and analyses, but also to ensure the medical safety of the subjects," the abstract states. "The cross and suspension system were designed to accommodate various positional adjustments of the body as appropriate." The male subjects "were carefully chosen to correspond, as closely as possible, to the physiology depicted by the frontal and dorsal imprints visible on the Shroud of Turin," they write in the abstract. They tried to re-create these features when they placed each volunteer on the cross. The researchers used the image on the cloth to work out the mechanics of the crucifixion, such as where the nails were hammered in, according to the abstract. But the abstract describes "an experimental protocol by which special wrist and foot attachment mechanisms safely and realistically suspend the male subjects on a full-size cross." The research team from the Turin Shroud Center of Colorado in Colorado Springs would not comment on the crucifixion experiments before presenting them to the American Academy of Forensic Sciences's (AAFS's) annual meeting on 21 February. But the researchers hope the experiment will "support the hypothesis of Shroud authenticity in some new and unexpected ways." ![]() And they are the latest in a tit-for-tat series of tests, academic rebuttals, and furious arguments over the provenance-or lack thereof-of the centuries-old religious artifact. The mock crucifixions are the most reliable recreations yet of the death of Jesus, the researchers suggest in an online abstract of a paper to be presented next week at a forensic science conference in Baltimore, Maryland (abstract E73 on p. Most mainstream scientists agree the shroud is a fake created in the 14 th century. In an attempt to prove that the Turin Shroud-a strip of linen that some people believe was used to wrap Jesus's body after his crucifixion and carries the image of his face-is real, researchers have strapped human volunteers to a cross and drenched them in blood.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |